Bursa’da bir dokuma fabrikas\u0131nda devereci olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kad\u0131n, ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapan deverecilerin kendisinden daha fazla \u00fccret ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, her iki deverecinin de ayn\u0131 k\u0131demde olmamalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ayn\u0131 \u00fccreti ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131rf kad\u0131n oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in di\u011fer devereciler ile ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen daha az \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetti. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nin yolunu tutan kad\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7i; daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin i\u015fyerinde \u00fccret konusunda cinsiyet ayr\u0131m\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130\u015f Kanunu’na g\u00f6re i\u015fverenin e\u015fit i\u015f yapan i\u015f\u00e7iye e\u015fit \u00fccret \u00f6demekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funu, bu borca ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranan i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7iye 4 ayl\u0131k \u00fccreti tutar\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6demesi gerekti\u011fini dile getirdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00c7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilere \u00f6denen \u00fccret fark\u0131n\u0131 da i\u015f\u00e7iye \u00f6demek zorunda oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin e\u015fit i\u015flem borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015f akdini hakl\u0131 sebeple feshetti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, \u00fccret fark\u0131 ile e\u015fit i\u015flem borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bursa 4. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nde ifade veren i\u015fveren ise davac\u0131n\u0131n, kendisi ile ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 zikretti\u011fi deverecilerinin k\u0131dem ve tecr\u00fcbesinin davac\u0131ya oranla daha fazla oldu\u011funu kaydetti. Maa\u015flar\u0131 emsal g\u00f6sterilen iki ustan\u0131n davac\u0131dan daha fazla i\u015f tecr\u00fcbesi kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve davac\u0131ya oranla daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma sergilemesi nedeniyle \u00fccretlerinde yap\u0131lan genel iyile\u015ftirmede daha fazla \u00fccrete hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer deverecilere oranla daha az \u00fcretim kapasitesine sahip oldu\u011funu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alarak i\u015fine devam etti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n, kendisinden daha fazla mesleki tecr\u00fcbesi bulunan ve kendisine oranla daha fazla \u00fcretim yapan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlarla maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131yaslayarak haks\u0131zl\u0131k yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015f akdini haks\u0131z ve k\u00f6t\u00fcniyetle feshetti\u011fini, bu sebeple k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ile \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 fark\u0131na hak kazanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini talep etti. Davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne h\u00fckmeden Mahkeme; y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline, di\u011fer taleplerin reddine karar verdi. Karar\u0131 davac\u0131 avukat\u0131 temyiz edince devreye Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi girdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Emsal nitelikte bir karara imza atan 9. Hukuk Dairesi, e\u015fit davranma ilkesinin t\u00fcm hukuk alan\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli olup, i\u015f hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan i\u015fverene i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7iler aras\u0131nda hakl\u0131 ve objektif bir neden olmad\u0131k\u00e7a farkl\u0131 davranmama borcu y\u00fckledi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekti. Kararda \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201cE\u015fit davranma borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ispat y\u00fck\u00fc i\u015f\u00e7ide olmakla birlikte, an\u0131lan maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7i ihlalin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bi\u00e7imde g\u00f6steren bir delil ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde aksi i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ispatlanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, davac\u0131 ayn\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer personellerle ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde kendisine daha az \u00fccret \u00f6deyen i\u015fverenin e\u015fit davranma borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini bu nedenle hakl\u0131 olarak feshetti\u011fi iddias\u0131yla tazminat ve fark \u00fccret isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7iye i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan di\u011fer deverecilere k\u0131yasla daha az \u00fccret \u00f6dendi\u011fi konusunda tart\u0131\u015fma yoktur. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve \u00f6zellikle daval\u0131 i\u015fveren tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir i\u015f\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, di\u011fer devereciler hangi i\u015fi yap\u0131yorlarsa davac\u0131n\u0131n da ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, yetene\u011finde veya performans\u0131nda hi\u00e7 bir yetersizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dosyadaki mevcut delil durumuna g\u00f6re davac\u0131 cinsiyet ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlayamam\u0131\u015f ise de i\u015fverenin e\u015fit i\u015fe e\u015fit \u00fccret \u00f6dememesi e\u015fit i\u015flem borcunun ihlali niteli\u011findedir ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k tazminat\u0131n\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi de dikkate al\u0131narak, anlan yasan\u0131n 5. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n fark \u00fccretleri de hesaplanmal\u0131 ve h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Di\u011fer yandan davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 k\u0131dem ve ayn\u0131 i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7i ile ayn\u0131 \u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 suretiyle e\u015fit i\u015flem borcunun ihlal edilmesi 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 24\/II-e maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015f\u00e7iye hakl\u0131 fesih yetkisi verir. Bu itibarla i\u015f akdini bu nedenle hakl\u0131 nedene dayal\u0131 olarak fesheden davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 iste\u011finin de kabul\u00fc gerekirken yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na oy birli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bursa\u2019da, bir dokuma fabrikas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kad\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7i, kendisiyle ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapan erkek i\u015f\u00e7ilerin daha fazla \u00fccret ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131rf kad\u0131n oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen kendisine daha az \u00fccret \u00f6dendi\u011fini iddia ederek mahkemenin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ald\u0131. Y\u0131llar s\u00fcren davada son s\u00f6z\u00fc s\u00f6yleyen Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi, i\u015fverenin e\u015fit i\u015fe e\u015fit \u00fccret \u00f6dememesinin e\u015fit i\u015flem borcunun ihlali […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1573609,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1573608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1573608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1573608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1573608\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1573609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1573608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1573608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1573608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}